Hi all:
I must confess this series passed me by but I could not resist when I saw this novel was available on NetGalley…

The Mystery of Three Quarters: The New Hercule Poirot Mystery by Sophie Hannah A good old-fashioned and convoluted mystery with a Poirot in good shape.
The world’s most beloved detective, Hercule Poirot – the legendary star of Agatha Christie’s Murder on the Orient Express and most recently The Monogram Murders and Closed Casket—returns in a stylish, diabolically clever mystery set in 1930’s London.
Returning home after lunch one day, Hercule Poirot finds an angry woman waiting outside his front door. She demands to know why Poirot has sent her a letter accusing her of the murder of Barnabas Pandy, a man she has neither heard of nor ever met.
Poirot has also never heard of a Barnabas Pandy and has accused nobody of murder. Shaken, he goes inside, only to find that he has a visitor waiting for him — a man who also claims also to have received a letter from Poirot that morning, accusing him of the murder of Barnabas Pandy…
Poirot wonders how many more letters of this sort have been sent in his name. Who sent them, and why? More importantly, who is Barnabas Pandy, is he dead, and, if so, was he murdered? And can Poirot find out the answers without putting more lives in danger?
https://www.amazon.com/Mystery-Three-Quarters-Hercule-Poirot-ebook/dp/B079KKJHMM/
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Mystery-Three-Quarters-Hercule-Poirot-ebook/dp/B079KKJHMM/

About the author:
Sophie Hannah is an internationally bestselling crime fiction writer. Her crime novels have been translated into 34 languages and published in 51 countries. Her psychological thriller The Carrier won the Specsavers National Book Award for Crime Thriller of the Year in 2013. In 2014 and 2016, Sophie published The Monogram Murders and Closed Casket, the first new Hercule Poirot mysteries since Agatha Christie’s death, both of which were national and international bestsellers.
Sophie’s novels The Point of Rescue and The Other Half Lives have been adapted for television as Case Sensitive, starring Olivia Williams and Darren Boyd. Sophie is also a bestselling poet who has been shortlisted for the TS Eliot award. Her poetry is studied at GCSE and A-level throughout the UK. Sophie is an Honorary Fellow of Lucy Cavendish College, Cambridge. She lives in Cambridge with her husband, two children, and dog.
Sophie’s website is www.sophiehannah.com, and you can follow her on Twitter at @sophiehannahcb1
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Sophie-Hannah/e/B001JP23J6/
My review:
Thanks to NetGalley and to Harper Collins UK for the ARC copy of this book that I freely chose to review.
I had not realised that an author had been commissioned to write new Poirot mysteries, and as I saw this book after a conversation about Agatha Christie, I could not resist requesting a copy of it. This means I have not read the author’s two previous New Poirot Mysteries (The Monogram Murders and Closed Casket), so I cannot discuss the evolution of the characters or compare this one to the previous two. I am not familiar with any of Hannah’s previous writing either. I have read some of Agatha Christie’s novels and short stories, some of them I read translated into Spanish many years back (and might not have fully reflected her style of writing although I remember enjoying them) and I have not read a Poirot one in many years, although I have watched both films and TV series adapting some of Christie’s classic Poirot novels, so I would not dare to address this review to connoisseurs. Still, for what is worth, this is my opinion.
I enjoyed the novel. The case starts with four seemingly random people accusing Poirot of sending them letters accusing them of a crime. Not only has Poirot not sent them such letters, but the alleged victim died of natural causes (he was an elderly man and drowned whilst bathing, alone in his bathroom). So, who is behind the letters? And what’s his or her motive? I will try and not reveal any spoilers, but I can say that there are plenty of clues to follow, red-herrings along the way, peculiar characters, true and false motivations, slices of cake, dogs, a public school for boys, a wonderful old mansion, faulty typewriters, likeable and less likeable characters, and a Poirot in full form.
The novel is told by Edward Catchpool, a Scotland Yard Inspector who, like Captain Hastings in Christie’s stories, is the scribe behind the stories. He is a new creation and one of a couple of characters that, from the comments, I have read, are regulars in The New Poirot Mysteries. The narration is split between parts written in the third person (when Catchpool is not present) that, when we are some way into the book, he explains he has compiled through later discussions with Poirot, and those written in the first person, that pertain to events he witnessed or participated in himself. This works well, in general (we might wonder briefly how Poirot might have become aware of some detail or conversation, but we all know he has his ways), and it also allows for any differences in style with previous novels to be blamed on Catchpool’s own style of writing (that would not be the same as Hastings’). The language is straightforward and effective in conveying the story, without any jarring moments due to usage inappropriate to the historical period. Catchpool himself does not reveal much of his own personality through the novel and he is mostly a blank canvas to reflect Poirot’s thoughts and his deductive process. There are some interesting personal morsels about the inspector included in the narrative (he does not like his boss at work and he is averse to the idea of marriage, especially one to suit his mother’s taste) but not enough for readers to become truly attached to him. As this is the third novel and I have not read the two previous one, it is likely that people who have followed the whole series will know and appreciate the character more fully (but this is not necessary for the enjoyment of the mystery).
Notwithstanding my disclaimer on my limited expertise in all things Poirot, the Poirot in the novel will be recognisable to most people who have some familiarity with Christie’s detective. People still think he is French, his ‘little grey cells’ are mentioned often, he sprinkles his dialogue with French terms and some peculiar English translations (‘oil of the olives’ instead of olive oil, for instance), he is a keen observer, opinionated, with high regard for himself, and a lover of comfort and good food and drink. Perhaps he is an extreme version of Poirot, but I could not help but remember, as I read the book, that Christie expressed her dislike for the character and called him: detestable, bombastic, tiresome, ego-centric little creep. (We might agree or not with her assessment, although her Poirot had some moments of weakness and sometimes showed more of a soft heart than he would have liked to admit). He is that here and keeps making demands on people, puts to the test his ideas and theories in pretty cruel ways, and drags the resolution of the case, creating anxiety and disquiet among all. But he can come up with pretty amazing insights and his figure has always been one of those that perhaps we would not like to meet personally, but we nonetheless admire.
Some of the secondary characters are almost caricatures, and the story is fundamentally about the plot and not about the psychological complexity of those involved, but there are some likeable characters, and I had a soft spot for the younger generation (and the dog). There are good descriptions and observations that will keep people guessing and turning the pages, although the story is not told at a fast pace, and the ending drags on (as is usual for this type of stories, where the reveal can become as frustrating for the readers as for those present). Although the evidence, in this case, remains mostly circumstantial and stretches somewhat the imagination, everything is explained and tied up and people who like a definite ending will have no complaint. There is a murder but there is no explicit violence or bad language and although it will not suit readers looking for gritty and realistic thrillers, it should not offend or discourage most readers who love a gentler mystery.
I am not sure if this would fit into the category of cozy mystery. By its tone and nature, it should do, but many books marketed as cozy mysteries abound in over-the-top characters, seem to place more emphasis on other aspects rather than the actual mystery (romance, recipes, pets…), include elements of other genres (paranormal, for instance), and can be frustrating to any readers looking for logical explanation and a meaty, intriguing, and complex mystery they can actually solve. This is like a good old-fashioned mystery, with plenty of character, a light read that will keep you entertained, and if that’s what you’d like to read, I’d recommend it. (Does it add anything new to the Poirot canon? Well, that is a matter for another discussion. Judging by the reviews, most people think the author has done a good job and has made the character her own). Personally, I’ll keep track of the author and future novels in the series.
Thanks to NetGalley, the publisher, and the author, for the novel, thanks to all of you for reading, and if you’ve enjoyed it, please remember to like, share, commment, click, and always keep reading, reviewing and smiling!
Poirot is my favourite Christie character, so I was pleased to read that the author has done him justice with these new novels.
As she is already a best-seller, she won’t miss me not buying a copy, as I have to say I have been rather spoiled by the David Suchet TV series. I can no longer see any other aspect of the character, since he took on the role. Despite my love for the time period, (and the Art Deco font on the top cover) I believe that the character should be left in his time and place, and don’t feel the need for more of his adventures.
Best wishes, Pete.
Thanks, Peter (I had written Poirot first! It goes to show how much we think about the character). I understand perfectly well what you mean. I also cannot help but think of David Suchet, although I have read that there are new adaptations planned. I must confess the offer of the book came at a curious time for me. I had just been chatting to my mother about Agatha Christie and how she had actually written the last adventure of both Poirot and Miss Marple early in her career, leaving instructions the circumstances when they should be published, and observed that due to that we were unlikely to have a never-ending number of Poirot adventures written by other writers, when I saw this and wondered what (apart from the money-making opportunity and issues of copyright) had induced the organisation to commission more novels and why from this writer in particular. So I felt curious enough to check it out. And yes, I could see it on the telly, for sure.
Have a great week.
Hi Olga. I enjoyed this very mindful review. I understand the desire to write and to read fan fiction… yet at the same time I don’t. I realize this is not presented as fan fiction, but as the genuine article… and I get that someone (who apparently is legally able to) commissioned her to write Christie’s character. I know it shouldn’t, but the whole idea just bugs me.
I’m sure it’s a fantastic story and that she is a wonderful writer, able to imagine characters of her own. I don’t mean any offense.
Keep up the wonderful reviews. Looking forward to anything you write. Hugs.
Thanks, Teagan. I know what you mean. As I told Pete, I was curious because I knew it had been done for other characters (James Bond, for example) but had never read any of the stories resulting from those efforts and was intrigued. I wonder what Christie might have thought about it, although I am aware she wasn’t too fond of Poirot, so she might not have been that opposed to the idea.
In some cases, fan-fiction or variations on novels are clearly homages or actualizations of stories and characters that might help get more readers to the original. I guess no stories are truly original, and as you say, here it is all legal and aboveboard. I must confess to enjoying some stories or characters so much that I’d like to read more about them and have even thought about writing their stories myself but I am not sure I’d ever feel comfortable doing it (not that I’ve been offered!). But the appetite for stories in the Christie universe is enormous, so I’m not surprised by the move.
Have a great week!
That’s very true. I’m sure I would enjoy this one. Hurricane on the way… Hugs.
I find it quite odd that someone is writing about Poirot. He is so famous and there are many books featuring him so it seems unnecessary to me. I am a purest and don’t understand these things. Your review is good but I don’t think I would read a book of this nature that is not written by Agatha Christie.
I know what you mean, Robbie. It is an official thing, though, and the author has been chosen by the Agatha Christie’s Society (https://www.agathachristie.com/)so they must think it is a good way to get readers to keep interested and perhaps get new readers to discover the classics. I don’t think it’s necessary either, but Christie was very savvy and she might have been all for it (who knows?). She was not that fond of Poirot. There are many authors who write novels in franchises or new versions or reimaginings of classics (and prequels and sequels), and I have enjoyed some of those, so perhaps it does not matter so much where the inspiration comes from if people want to read it. I have never been one for writing fan-fiction but it is quite a big thing.
But there are plenty of new books as well. In my case, I was just curious to see how the author would go about it.
Have a great week.