Hi all:
This is a review of one of those books that you hear so much about that you either decide to ignore completely (because you feel as if you’ve already read it) or read it to see ‘what the fuss is about’. This time, and because the book hasn’t been out for that long yet, I went with the second option…

The Woman in the Window: A Novel by A. J. Finn
Instant #1 New York Times Bestseller!
“Astounding. Thrilling. Amazing.” —Gillian Flynn
“Unputdownable.” —Stephen King
“A dark, twisty confection.” —Ruth Ware
“Absolutely gripping.” —Louise Penny
For readers of Gillian Flynn and Tana French comes one of the decade’s most anticipated debuts, to be published in thirty-six languages around the world and already in development as a major film from Fox: a twisty, powerful Hitchcockian thriller about an agoraphobic woman who believes she witnessed a crime in a neighboring house.
It isn’t paranoia if it’s really happening . . .
Anna Fox lives alone—a recluse in her New York City home, unable to venture outside. She spends her day drinking wine (maybe too much), watching old movies, recalling happier times . . . and spying on her neighbors.
Then the Russells move into the house across the way: a father, a mother, their teenage son. The perfect family. But when Anna, gazing out her window one night, sees something she shouldn’t, her world begins to crumble—and its shocking secrets are laid bare.
What is real? What is imagined? Who is in danger? Who is in control? In this diabolically gripping thriller, no one—and nothing—is what it seems.
Twisty and powerful, ingenious and moving, The Woman in the Window is a smart, sophisticated novel of psychological suspense that recalls the best of Hitchcock.
https://www.amazon.com/Woman-Window-Novel-J-Finn/dp/0062678418/
(I couldn’t find it in digital version yet in Amazon.com but can’t be far)
Interestingly enough, this is the description in Amazon.co.uk:
THE NUMBER ONE NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER
GET READY FOR THE BIGGEST THRILLER OF 2018!
‘Astounding. Thrilling. Amazing’ Gillian Flynn
‘One of those rare books that really is unputdownable’ Stephen King
‘Twisted to the power of max’ Val McDermid
‘A dark, twisty confection’ Ruth Ware
What did she see?
It’s been ten long months since Anna Fox last left her home. Ten months during which she has haunted the rooms of her old New York house like a ghost, lost in her memories, too terrified to step outside.
Anna’s lifeline to the real world is her window, where she sits day after day, watching her neighbours. When the Russells move in, Anna is instantly drawn to them. A picture-perfect family of three, they are an echo of the life that was once hers.
But one evening, a frenzied scream rips across the silence, and Anna witnesses something no one was supposed to see. Now she must do everything she can to uncover the truth about what really happened. But even if she does, will anyone believe her? And can she even trust herself?
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Woman-Window-hottest-thriller-bestseller-ebook/dp/B074563H4L/
I wonder if they have a different description in each place… Let’s check…
In Canada, is the Amazon.com one.
In Australia the UK one… OK. Interesting… I’ll have to do more research into this…

About the author:
I’m A. J. Finn, author of THE WOMAN IN THE WINDOW — a debut novel that Stephen King describes as “remarkable” and I call “the best I could do.” Guess which quote appears on the jacket.
THE WOMAN IN THE WINDOW has been sold in 40 territories around the world and is currently in development as a major film at Fox 2000, to be produced by Oscar-winner Scott Rudin and written by Pulitzer winner Tracy Letts. I really want a cameo in the movie, in case anyone asks.
I spent a decade working in publishing in both New York and London, with a particular emphasis on thrillers and mysteries. Authors I published or helped acquire over the years include Robert Galbraith (aka J. K. Rowling), Agatha Christie, Patricia Cornwell, Carl Hiaasen, Sara Paretsky, and Nelson DeMille.
Now I write full-time, to the relief of my former colleagues. THE WOMAN IN THE WINDOW was inspired by a range of experiences: my lifelong love affair with suspense fiction, from the Sherlock Holmes stories I devoured as a kid to the work of Patricia Highsmith, whom I studied at the graduate level at Oxford; my passion for classic cinema, especially the films of Alfred Hitchcock; and my struggles with agoraphobia and depression. The result, I hope, is a psychological thriller in the vein of Gillian Flynn, Tana French, and Kate Atkinson, among others.
Stuff I love: reading; swimming; cooking; dogs; ice cream; travel. (Note that third semicolon. It’s crucial. I do not love cooking dogs.) Given the chance, I’d seriously consider cloning my late yellow Labrador, Tugboat (2001-2012) — one of history’s few truly perfect creations. I collect first-edition books and divide my time between New York and London.
https://www.amazon.com/A.-J.-Finn/e/B074BPQ4X3/
My review:
Thanks to NetGalley and to Harper Collins for providing me an ARC copy of this book that I freely decided to review.
I have been reading a lot of thrillers recently and kept coming across this book and, eventually, I thought I would read it. The description and the accolades mention Hitchcock and noir film and that convinced me I should read it.
Many of the reviews compare it to The Girl on the Train. Although I have watched the movie adaptation of that book, I haven’t read the novel, so I cannot compare the style, although yes, I agree that the story is very similar. This is more Rear Window (because the protagonist, Anna Fox, a psychologist, suffers from agoraphobia following a traumatic incident, and she is stuck at home, in New York) with touches of Body Double (I agree with the reviewer who mentioned that). It also brought to mind, for me, apart from the many Hitchcock and noir movies the character herself is so fond of (Shadow of a Doubt, The Lady Vanishes, Rope), some newer movies, like Copycat (the main protagonist is also a psychologist suffering from agoraphobia, in that case after being assaulted by a serial killer) and Murder by Numbers (that is a new treatment of Rope).
Anna is an unreliable narrator, and she tells us the story in the first-person (I know some readers don’t like that). I do like unreliable narrators, but I did not feel there was much new or particularly insightful here. She is a psychologist who seems to be able to help others with their problems (she joins an online chat and helps others suffering from agoraphobia) but is not capable of fully accepting or recognising her own (she sees a psychiatrist once a week but lies to him, does not take the medication as prescribed, keeps drinking alcohol despite being fully aware of its depressant effects and knowing that it should not be mixed with her medication), and lies to others, and what is worse, to herself. The fog produced by the alcohol and her erratic use of medication make her unreliable (and yes, some of her medication can cause hallucinations, so there’s that too), and although her predicament and her agoraphobia are well portrayed, because a big twist (that if you’ve read enough books will probably suspect from very early on) needs to remain hidden, for plot reasons, it is difficult to fully empathise with her. She is intelligent, she loves old movies, and she’s articulate (although her intelligence and her insight are dulled by her own behaviour and her state of mind), but we only get a sense of who she really is (or was, before all this) quite late in the book, and yes, perhaps she is not that likeable even then (in fact, she might become even less likeable after the great reveal). Don’t get me wrong. I’ve loved books where the main protagonist is truly dislikeable, but I am not sure that is intentional here, and I felt that the character follows the plot and accommodates to its needs, rather than the other way round.
The rest of the characters… well, we don’t know. As we see them from Anna’s perspective, and this is impaired, there is not much to guide us. She is paranoid at times and can change from totally depending on somebody and thinking they are the only person who can help her, to dismissing them completely (that detail is well portrayed), but although some of the characters are potentially intriguing, we don’t know enough about any of them to get truly interested. This is a novel about Anna, her disintegrating mind, the lies she tells herself, and how her being in the wrong place at the wrong time (or rather, looking at the wrong place at the wrong time) almost ends her life. For me, the needs of the plot and of making it an interesting page-turner end up overpowering some of the other elements that I think are truly well achieved (like her mental health difficulties).
The writing style is fluid and competent, and it is evident that the writer knows what readers of the genre will expect (yes, from his biography is easy to see he knows the knots and bolts of the profession), although, personally, I think people who don’t read thrillers regularly will find it more interesting than those who read them often, as avid thriller readers are likely to spot the twists and expect what is coming next early on. The agoraphobia aspects of the story are well written (and from his biography it is clear that the author has a first-hand knowledge of the condition), although I agree with some comments that the many mentions of the wine spilling down the carpet or on the character’s clothes, of opening another bottle, and abandoning a glass of wine somewhere could have been reduced, and we would still have got the message.
Lovers of film-noir and Hitchcock movies will enjoy the references to the films, some very open, and others more subtle, although the general level of the character’s awareness and her wit reduces as the book moves on due to the stress and pressure Anna is under. The ending… Well, I’m trying not to write any spoilers so I’ll keep my peace, although, let’s say you might enjoy the details, but there are not that many possible suspects, so you might guess correctly. (Yes, it does follow the standard rules).
In my opinion, this is a well-written book, that perhaps tries too hard to pack all the elements that seem required nowadays to make it big in the thriller genre: a female unreliable narrator, domestic problems (domestic noir), meta-fictional references to other books and films, twists and turns galore, witty dialogue (not so much, but yes, especially early on Anna can quote with the best of them), an action filled ending with a positive/hopeful message. I enjoyed the descriptions of Anna’s agoraphobia and, particularly, the way the house becomes another character (that is what I felt gave it most of its noir feel). People who don’t read many thrillers or watch many movies in the genre are more likely to be surprised and thrilled than those who do, as the storyline will be very familiar to many. I am intrigued to see what the writer will produce next, and I am not surprised to hear that the book’s film adaptation rights have been already bought. That figures.
Thanks to NetGalley, to the publisher, and to the author for the book, thanks to all of you for reading and remember to like, share, comment, click and REVIEW!
[amazon_link asins=’B002RSOTSM,B002RPI2QK,B000I9YLXU,B000I9WW2M,B002W7H3EA,B002RXS1VS,B004VFK5LO,1594634025′ template=’ProductCarousel’ store=’wwwauthortran-20′ marketplace=’US’ link_id=’78083f03-15cf-11e8-8a84-69cf69588d6a’]
Even before I got to the early connections, I was thinking ‘Copycat’, and ‘Rear Window’. I have to say that it already feels too derivative, and I haven’t even opened the book.
Best wishes, Pete.
Thanks, Pete. I must say I’ve read very good reviews of the books and it is well written and entertaining, but it probably depends on how many books (and movies) one has read or watched on the genre. I hope you have a good week. Freezing here and all covered in snow.
We had snow all weekend, but it is slowly melting in the sun today. 🙂
Here too. Although I had to go out (I’ve finally managed to get my hair cut) and it feels pretty cold still. Take care!
As always your reviews are a pleasure to read Olga… x
Thank you, Sally! I hope you have a great week. Here we’ll see if we can defrost…;)
Here too… just off to clear the windscreen… xxx
It’s melting in the sun here, although it feels cold outside. 🙂
Sounds great, engaging review. 🙂
Thank you. Have a great week!
Sally is right, Olga. Your reviews are always good reading. I enjoy the discussions here too. So… I do enjoy a Hitchcockian thriller, so I’m trying not to feel biased about this one, if it’s well written. Yet a number of things bother me: All the hype for an “unknown” — probably means he knows someone with a ton of influence. Try as I might to resist, it tends to get under my skin for a man to write from a woman’s point of view (it nearly always seems “off”) particularly if written in first person. AND he is writing about her disability (what does he know about it?) — although you said you enjoyed that part, so I take your word for it that he got it right. As Pete said, it also seems very derivative.
Thanks for a truly helpful review. Hugs.
Thanks, Teagan. I read the author’s biography and he worked as an editor for quite a few big publishing companies, so he definitely “knows” people in the right places and knows the formula quite well (if he doesn’t, there’s no hope for anybody else, I’d say, although we all hope books that go beyond standard formulas get a chance and make it). And he says he has suffered from agoraphobia (or still does, I’m not sure), so that makes perfect sense as to how that part would feel particularly insightful. It is well-written, but if one reads a lot of thrillers it might feel very familiar. Have a lovely week and thanks for commenting. ♥
Fascinating review, Olga. I am intrigued. Another title for my trailing list. Thanks for sharing. I need to up my game one of these days. 🙂
I can’t keep up myself, Tess. Every time I switch on the Kindle I see so many books that I want to read… Oh well, we’ll keep going. Nice to see you around!
Great review, Olga. I bought it with this month’s audible credit so I’ll be reading it soon. I also like unreliable narrators.
From your review and what I’ve read, I can see the novel has been made to fit a mold, which is fine for readers who read maybe a thriller a month or less, but for avid readers like you and me who have read dozens of thrillers, we need something more, or something original, with a different angle…
Thanks, Luccia. Yes, it seems to tick all the right boxes, but I think it will do better with people who don’t read that much in that genre, although I’m intrigued to see what you make of it. It is well written, for sure… 😉
As I began reading your review, Olga, I thought: Another great thriller to add to my TBR! Then you mentioned, “avid thriller readers are likely to spot the twists and expect what is coming next early on.” Yep, that’s me! My family and friends always warn me not to verbalize whodunit when we’re about to watch a thriller on TV. I’m rarely surprised, unless the script is well-written, convoluted, and has several possible culprits. Thanks so much for this excellent review ❤
Thanks, Tina. I’m also terrible for that. Of course, writers (and filmmakers) must plant clues along the way, otherwise, the reader/viewer feels cheated, but then again, I guess they are aiming at the market of people already interested in the genre. It is well-written, for sure, although it is always a bit tricky when the author intentionally uses so many previous works as a reference. I wonder what the author will write next! Have a lovely day.
A nice review, Olga. I won’t read this book. I didn’t enjoy The girl on the train, I found the main character to be very irritating in her weakness. I think I will feel the same about this one.
Thanks, Robbie. There is some of that, especially as she is a psychologist and shows very poor insight, but the agoraphobia is well portrayed. I haven’t read the Girl on the Train, although I watched the movie, but I’m not that keen on it either.